“The assembled state shows no active divergences across the four pillars, suggesting a low immediate risk that key questions (e.g., segmentation bleed or boundary ambiguity) pose a conflict. The prevailing optimism around advanced spatial transcriptomics workflows (PGST, STCF) provides a constructive framework: these platforms inherently incorporate high‐resolution nuclear expansion and cytoplasmic detection strategies that can mitigate so-called “ghost data” artifacts. As such, we project that the current trajectory—integrating these spatial approaches with targeted dissociation controls—will continue to drive consensus rather than fracture it.”