“Overall posture: AMBER (medium-high uncertainty). Rationale 1. Machine & Mood pillars both revolve around whether Attorney General Pam Bondi has been dismissed. The majority of early-dated, higher-stability machine claims (49596, 49716, 50578, 51516, 51835) and mood claims (49828, 49850, 51826) say she was fired. A later machine flash (51776) and some map traffic (51691) insist she is NOT leaving. The later bulletin cites Fox News but offers no corroborating detail and carries a lower stability (0.7) and marginal confidence. Given the breadth and temporal spread of “Bondi fired” reports versus the single contradictory item, we treat the latter as a retraction/clarification attempt that is still being vetted. Net assessment: >60 % likelihood Bondi is out, but confirmation still required. 2. Mechanics pillar conflict about Army leadership mirrors the above: multiple consistent wires (49831, 51717) confirm Gen. Randy George’s ouster; only a speculative Q-and-A style post (49826, stability 0.6) questions whether a different general is the target. Net: consider George’s removal plausible and pending DoD confirmation. 3. Map pillar items on Venezuelan politics and recruitment slogans are routine and carry high stability; risk is minimal. Resolution of Divergences • DIV-INT-01 & DIV-CROSS-01 (Bondi): treat as an unfolding personnel decision. Hold judgement until an on-record White House or DOJ statement is issued. Flag downstream analyses that rely on Bondi’s status as TENTATIVE. • DIV-INT-02 (Randy George): similar provisional stance; await Pentagon transcript or Reuters on-camera confirmation. Residual Risk Because the two highest-friction stories involve real-time personnel moves, the posture remains AMBER until primary-source confirmation or 24-hour media convergence reduces uncertainty.”

“All pillars converge on the narrative that “Attorney General” Pam Bondi has been formally subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee to testify on the Epstein investigation and is set to appear—along with Deputy AG Todd Blanche—on Capitol Hill. No material contradictions among the claims appear, so procedural coherence is high. However, there is an external factual tension: Pam Bondi is a former Florida Attorney General, not the sitting U.S. Attorney General (currently Merrick Garland). This status mismatch introduces a credibility hazard that could invalidate the entire storyline if unchecked. While the machine-pillar items about Pete Hegseth are orthogonal, their presence broadens the information space and slightly dilutes focus but does not create direct conflict. Net risk posture: MODERATE-TO-HIGH. Internal consistency is good, but the potential misidentification of Bondi’s current office raises a significant misinformation risk that could quickly erode trust if propagated without verification.”