“Overall informational risk is MODERATE. The apparent clashes are mostly narrative, not factual show-stoppers: 1) The Joey-versus-Sammy homicide counts involve two distinct actors, so the divergence is reconciled by differentiating speakers rather than choosing a winner. 2) Mood-pillar tension (self-portrayal as benevolent versus accusations of molestation) remains unresolved legally, keeping reputational volatility high but confined to credibility rather than operational certainty. 3) Joey’s denial of a mob’s existence versus the FBI’s designation is a classic authority–subject standoff; it does not paralyze decision-making but signals potential bias from both sides. Taking these into account, the knowledge graph retains usability with caution, as none of the frictions invalidate the core mechanics or machine narratives.”