“All surfaced statements concentrate in the mood pillar, alleging a systematic government deception about casualty figures but offering no corroborating evidence across the machine, map, or mechanics pillars. Because no direct factual support or contradictory data surfaced, the pipeline registers no explicit divergence—every claim points in the same accusatory direction. However, that unanimity itself flags informational risk: a single-pillar echo chamber can amplify unverified narratives. Accordingly, the final risk posture is ELEVATED: the claims could undermine public trust if wrong, yet we currently lack the cross-pillar validation needed to confirm or debunk them. The apparent absence of divergence is resolved by recognizing it as a data-coverage gap, not proof of accuracy.”