“Overall, the assembled claims present a coherent and largely non-controversial picture of incremental product improvements by Jeep and Mazda. Claim stability scores are high (most ≥ 0.7) and no pillar-to-pillar or intra-pillar contradictions were detected, leaving the divergence register empty. Given the absence of factual collisions and the technical, low-stakes nature of the subject matter (vehicle specifications rather than safety-critical or market-moving assertions), the portfolio’s exposure is minimal. Final risk posture: LOW. No further reconciliation steps are required—monitor only for future updates once real-world testing data or official EPA figures are released.”